Grammar counts, bi-atch.

Thanks to lagizma for the heads up on this story, which vindicates editors, English teachers, and other uncompromising grammarians everywhere: Misused Comma May Cost Company Millions. Globeandmail.com reports:

Rogers [Communications Inc.] thought it had a five-year deal with Aliant Inc. to string Rogers’ cable lines across thousands of utility poles in the Maritimes for an annual fee of $9.60 per pole. But early last year, Rogers was informed that the contract was being cancelled and the rates were going up. Impossible, Rogers thought, since its contract was iron-clad until the spring of 2007 and could potentially be renewed for another five years.

Armed with the rules of grammar and punctuation, Aliant disagreed. The construction of a single sentence in the 14-page contract allowed the entire deal to be scrapped with only one-year’s notice, the company argued.

Language buffs take note — Page 7 of the contract states: The agreement “shall continue in force for a period of five years from the date it is made, and thereafter for successive five year terms, unless and until terminated by one year prior notice in writing by either party.”

Rogers’ intent in 2002 was to lock into a long-term deal of at least five years. But when regulators with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) parsed the wording, they reached another conclusion.

The validity of the contract and the millions of dollars at stake all came down to one point — the second comma in the sentence.

Had it not been there, the right to cancel wouldn’t have applied to the first five years of the contract and Rogers would be protected from the higher rates it now faces.

“Based on the rules of punctuation,” the comma in question “allows for the termination of the [contract] at any time, without cause, upon one-year’s written notice,” the regulator said.

Rogers was dumbfounded. The company said it never would have signed a contract to use roughly 91,000 utility poles that could be cancelled on such short notice. Its lawyers tried in vain to argue the intent of the deal trumped the significance of a comma. “This is clearly not what the parties intended,” Rogers said in a letter to the CRTC.

But the CRTC disagreed. And the consequences are significant.

Rogers looks to lose $2.13 million. Seems like a decently paid proofreader might have been worth it, eh?

Classes start tomorrow—wish me luck.

16 thoughts on “Grammar counts, bi-atch.

  1. Good luck on your first day. We start Orientation tomorrow.
    I’d like your permission to print your journal entry, and after removing all identifyers give it to one of the writing professors here. She ‘collects’ stuff like this and uses it in class.

  2. So, umm, pretty amazing. And makes me think of the third (third?) of the Lemony Snicket books.

    And, also, good luck on the new school! Hope they’re half as cool as the fords.

  3. Hah! I love stories like this. Makes it all seem worthwhile. 😉

    Good luck tomorrow! You’re going to be GREAT! Those little Razorbacks might actually learn something for a change…

    • I’m liking it! It’s been too hot, obviously, and I’m not used to having to drive everywhere I go, but I think I’m getting acclimated.

      We should get together sometime — my LJ friends were my first friends in the area…

      • I’d definitely love to hang out sometime. Maybe grab some coffee one of these evenings? Throw me an email (edgesk@gmail.com) and we’ll iron out the details.

  4. Let us not forget that “commas” use to be “decimal” points, and in many places in the world they still are used as such, when it comes to using numbers. (so 5.000.000 is the same as 5,000.000, or 5,000,000)

    What does that mean? That even in math, grammar was completely arbitrary and meaningless.

    And dude, they get one year’s notice. How could they be blind sided?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s